Vimal Kanwar & Ors. Vs.Kishore Dan & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 5513 of 2012 (arising out of SLP(C)No.6367 of 2012)
(Decided on May 3, 2013)
On the issue “Whether the salary
receivable by the claimant on compassionate appointment comes within the
periphery of the Motor Vehicles Act to be termed as “Pecuniary Advantage”
liable for deduction.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that:
“Compassionate appointment” can
be one of the conditions of service of an employee, if a scheme to that effect
is framed by the employer. In case, the employee dies in harness i.e. while in
service leaving behind the dependents, one of the dependents may request for
compassionate appointment to maintain the family of the deceased employee dies
in harness. This cannot be stated to be an advantage receivable by the heirs on
account of one’s death and have no correlation with the amount receivable under
a statute occasioned on account of accidental death. Compassionate appointment
may have nexus with the death of an employee while in service but it is not
necessary that it should have a correlation with the accidental death. An
employee dies in harness even in normal course, due to illness and to maintain
the family of the deceased one of the dependents may be entitled for
compassionate appointment but that cannot termed as “Pecuniary Advantage” that
comes under the periphery of Motor Vehicles Act and any amount received on such
appointment is not liable for deduction for determination of compensation under
the Motor Vehicles Act." [Para 20]
To see the full text follow the link: