Search Blog

Monday, April 29

Court/Tribunal should not generally set aside domestic enquiry on ground of delay in initiation –Supreme Court


Shri Anant R. Kulkarni vs. Y.P. Education Society & Ors, Civil Appeal No. 3935 of 2013 (Decided on 26.04.2013)


The Court examined following question:

“Whether the enquiry can be quashed on the ground of delay?”

 The Court held:

The court/tribunal should not generally set aside the departmental enquiry, and quash the charges on the ground of delay in initiation of disciplinary proceedings, as such a power is de hors the limitation of judicial review. In the event that the court/tribunal exercises such power, it exceeds its power of judicial review at the very threshold. Therefore, a charge-sheet or show cause notice, issued in the course of disciplinary proceedings, cannot ordinarily be quashed by court. The same principle is applicable in relation to there being a delay in conclusion of disciplinary proceedings. The facts and circumstances of the case in question, must be carefully examined, taking into consideration the gravity/magnitude of charges involved therein. The Court has to consider the seriousness and magnitude of the charges and while doing so the Court must weigh all the facts, both for and against the delinquent officers and come to the conclusion, which is just and proper considering the circumstances involved. The essence of the matter is that the court must take into consideration all relevant facts, and balance and weigh the same, so as to determine, if it is infact in the interest of clean and honest administration, that the said proceedings are allowed to be terminated, only on the ground of a delay in their conclusion.  [Para 8]



The Court quoted following case law

 State of U.P. v. Brahm Datt Sharma & Anr., AIR 1987 SC 943;

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bani Singh & Anr., AIR 1990 SC 1308;

 State of Punjab & Ors. v. Chaman Lal Goyal, (1995) 2 SCC 570;

 State of Andhra Pradesh v. N. Radhakishan, AIR 1998 SC 1833;

M.V. Bijlani v. Union of India & Ors., AIR 2006 SC 3475;

Union of India & Anr. v. Kunisetty Satyanarayana, AIR 2007 SC 906;

The Secretary, Ministry of Defence & Ors. v. Prabash Chandra Mirdha, AIR 2012 SC 2250;  and

Chairman, LIC of India & Ors. v. A. Masilamani, JT (2012) 11 SC 533). 



To see full text of judgement follow the link